From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Aaron Ecay <aaronecay@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Difference :header-args: and :header-args+:?
Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 21:18:55 -0400
Message-ID: <87vbp1r1fk.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <m2sik7bqun.fsf@krugs.de> <877g1j1gwx.fsf@gmail.com>
	<m2y4ty1q48.fsf@krugs.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55129)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <aaronecay@gmail.com>) id 1XQ4ee-000123-8e
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Sep 2014 21:19:10 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <aaronecay@gmail.com>) id 1XQ4eY-0006XI-9l
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Sep 2014 21:19:04 -0400
Received: from mail-qa0-x22a.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400d:c00::22a]:63701)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <aaronecay@gmail.com>) id 1XQ4eY-0006X2-5G
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Sep 2014 21:18:58 -0400
Received: by mail-qa0-f42.google.com with SMTP id dc16so7864131qab.15
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Fri, 05 Sep 2014 18:18:57 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <m2y4ty1q48.fsf@krugs.de>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Rainer M Krug <Rainer@krugs.de>, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hi Rainer,

2014ko irailak 5an, Rainer M Krug-ek idatzi zuen:
>=20
> Absolutely - but this has been (unfortunately!!!!!!!) be deprecated:
>=20
> Quoted from the manual [1] :
>=20
> ,----
> | [1] The deprecated syntax for default header argument properties, using
> | the name of the header argument as a property name directly, evaluates
> | the property as seen by the corresponding source block definition. This
> | behavior has been kept for backwards compatibility.
> `----
>=20
> I was using this deprecated behavior and I was *very* happy with it, but
> I am trying to adjust to the new syntax.
>=20
> So how can I use the new syntax?

Eric Schulte has said <http://mid.gmane.org/87wqce0w9n.fsf@gmail.com>
that the deprecation of this feature is =E2=80=9Cpremature=E2=80=9D.  I did=
n=E2=80=99t realize
at the time that the deprecation was also included in the manual rather
than just a code comment.  Possibly it should be un-deprecated.

Certainly I agree that the suggested replacement is less capable.  Sorry
I can=E2=80=99t help more.  Maybe Eric or Achim (who introduced the depreca=
tion)
will comment.

--=20
Aaron Ecay