From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Marcin Borkowski <mbork@wmi.amu.edu.pl>
Subject: Re: org-mode to latex, again!
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 20:46:29 +0200
Message-ID: <87vbhhngxm.fsf@wmi.amu.edu.pl>
References: <87ego5a2e3.fsf@skimble.plus.com> <87wq1xihbu.fsf@gmx.us>
	<87r3s5f6py.fsf@delle7240.chemeng.ucl.ac.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56338)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mbork@wmi.amu.edu.pl>) id 1Yd1BQ-0005Zw-Mk
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 14:46:44 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mbork@wmi.amu.edu.pl>) id 1Yd1BL-00055T-Ni
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 14:46:40 -0400
Received: from msg.wmi.amu.edu.pl ([2001:808:114:2::50]:46921)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mbork@wmi.amu.edu.pl>) id 1Yd1BL-00054e-CS
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 14:46:35 -0400
In-reply-to: <87r3s5f6py.fsf@delle7240.chemeng.ucl.ac.uk>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Rasmus <rasmus@gmx.us>, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org


On 2015-03-31, at 18:54, Eric S Fraga <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk> wrote:

> On Tuesday, 31 Mar 2015 at 12:36, Rasmus wrote:
>> Sharon Kimble <boudiccas@skimble.plus.com> writes:
>>
>>> #+LATEX:     \usepackage{~/texmf/tex/latex/commonstuff/mysty}
>>
>> Use #+latex_header.
>
> And possibly omit the full path as LaTeX should be able to find
> mysty.sty if located within the ~/texmf directory. (untested)

As I wrote - yes, provided you update the filename database
(e.g. launching mktexlsr from the command line).  (Because of speed, TeX
does not search the directory tree each time it looks for a package or
something, but uses a database in a familiar, "ls -R" format.)

Best,

-- 
Marcin Borkowski
http://octd.wmi.amu.edu.pl/en/Marcin_Borkowski
Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science
Adam Mickiewicz University