From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kyle Meyer Subject: Revisiting moving manual to Org (was: Is it possible to keep /all/ the heading properties in one place?) Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 12:57:58 -0500 Message-ID: <87vb57wg9l.fsf_-_@kyleam.com> References: <87fuwht5s3.fsf@gmail.com> <87lh683o7c.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <878u28ucl8.fsf@gmail.com> <878u283n15.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87oab4sw70.fsf@gmail.com> <87h9gw20mi.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87a8mooazg.fsf@gmail.com> <87a8mo1r69.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87h9gvrijp.fsf@gmail.com> <87ziulb48b.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87vb59ni5w.fsf@oremacs.com> <87egbvesqm.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48454) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aaS5E-0006t5-6f for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 12:58:12 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aaS59-0004Xg-9s for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 12:58:12 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp0.int.icgroup.com ([208.72.237.35]:59026 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aaS59-0004XE-5v for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 12:58:07 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87egbvesqm.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> (Nicolas Goaziou's message of "Mon, 29 Feb 2016 11:05:53 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Thomas S. Dye writes: > >> I worked on a project to port the Org manual to Org about three years >> ago. At the time, I thought the Texinfo exporter supported the project >> quite well. >> >> The project had a mixed reception and ultimately wasn't adopted, but I >> don't remember Texinfo exporter deficiencies figuring into the >> decision. > > AFAIR, the problem is that Emacs developers fix spelling issues right > into the ".texi" document, so we would need to backport each of their > changes into the Org source. Duplicated efforts. It is duplicated effort, but it's not too much beyond a normal backport. If this is the only issue with moving to Org for the manual, I'd be happy to take care of it when I backport changes. -- Kyle