From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?utf-8?B?U2HFoWEgSmFuacWha2E=?= Subject: Re: org-mode markup vs rst for general content Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2017 23:03:04 +0100 Message-ID: <87variglbb.fsf@atmarama.com> References: <87bmtahkvu.fsf@atmarama.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44513) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cm69Z-0005zY-I7 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Mar 2017 17:03:22 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cm69W-00005a-G6 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Mar 2017 17:03:21 -0500 Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=59702 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cm69W-00005V-8d for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Mar 2017 17:03:18 -0500 Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cm69N-0005FG-C4 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Mar 2017 23:03:09 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org John Kitchin writes: > Could you be more specific about what kind of richness you are looking > for? In a general sense…iow, it’s a fact that rst markup is richer than e.g. Markdown. Probably, Asciidoc(tor) also provides more semantic richness and make it suitable markup for longer docs/books, so I wonder where one can put org-mode’s markup on this scale? Sincerely, Gour -- You have a right to perform your prescribed duty, but you are not entitled to the fruits of action. Never consider yourself the cause of the results of your activities, and never be attached to not doing your duty.