From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric S Fraga Subject: Re: query about past scheduled events display in agenda Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2017 06:59:51 +0000 Message-ID: <87var8v15k.fsf@t3610> References: <87y3w5hgai.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <87ziglfmuh.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <8bd8d4fb8cea4cff82b125f05ba756dd@HE1PR01MB1898.eurprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com> <87k27pdolt.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <9e394e1f1cb44a288d889925ec89710b@HE1PR01MB1898.eurprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com> Reply-To: Eric S Fraga Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33379) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1conKD-0004YC-Gl for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Mar 2017 04:33:30 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1conK9-0006iC-Hy for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Mar 2017 04:33:29 -0400 Received: from mail-db5eur01on0114.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([104.47.2.114]:14586 helo=EUR01-DB5-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1conK9-0006hS-7Y for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Mar 2017 04:33:25 -0400 In-Reply-To: <9e394e1f1cb44a288d889925ec89710b@HE1PR01MB1898.eurprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com> (Nicolas Goaziou's message of "Thu, 16 Mar 2017 20:08:43 +0000") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain On Thursday, 16 Mar 2017 at 20:08, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > However, isn't the current behaviour the right one? I meant, in the > given example, it was scheduled once "yesterday", so it is really the > second time it is scheduled today, hence the "2x". > > Another way to look at it is by some sloppy analogy to algebra: you > write "2 \times{} x" but scarcely "1 \times{} x". Ah, okay, I see the rationale. For me, it looks strange because I have changed the leader to say "Overdue %4d d:" and so the number presented is 1 more than I would expect. No worries! At least I understand why it is the way it is. Thanks, eric -- : Eric S Fraga (0xFFFCF67D), Emacs 26.0.50, Org release_9.0.5-378-gf6f02e.dirty --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EARECAB0WIQSPXCedOQfhSlwpVw3IkZPY//z2fQUCWMuJZwAKCRDIkZPY//z2 fS8iAJwKojNSaiaHRlZ9cDdsMQlFtwLmhwCfbV2q/5oGJFsN5QuLMrT+9G+WRss= =zfWN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--