From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: [PATCH] Change: (org-agenda-bulk-action) Prompt w/number of marked items Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2018 21:32:46 +0200 Message-ID: <87va7i776p.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> References: <87r2ic46ke.fsf@alphapapa.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42573) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fy01Q-0006hN-G1 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Sep 2018 15:32:57 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fy01L-0005tf-Hq for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Sep 2018 15:32:56 -0400 Received: from relay9-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.199]:58241) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fy01L-0005mV-A5 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Sep 2018 15:32:51 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87r2ic46ke.fsf@alphapapa.net> (Adam Porter's message of "Sun, 02 Sep 2018 04:00:49 -0500") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Adam Porter Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hello, Adam Porter writes: > * lisp/org-agenda.el (org-agenda-bulk-action): When scattering, prompt > for number of days with number of marked items. Thank you. > A typical pattern for me is to mark a significant number of items > scheduled in the past and scatter them into the future. Usually I > want to schedule one item per day, i.e. across a number of days equal > to the number of marked items. The default prompt is 7 days, and > counting the number of items is tedious. This uses the number of > marked items as the initial prompt for the number of days. > > Alternatively, the number of marked items could be indicated in the > prompt string, e.g. "Scatter X tasks across how many days:". A > customizeable default could also be provided. FWIW, I slightly prefer the second option. Would you want to provide a patch for that? Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou