From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Sebastian Miele <sebastian.miele@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Respect buffer-local value of
 `org-edit-src-content-indentation'
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2020 19:31:47 +0000
Message-ID: <87v9oa2sik.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <87eezelxbq.fsf@gmail.com> <87a75nbsol.fsf@gnu.org>
 <87lfp7lkkx.fsf@gmail.com> <871rqz39ks.fsf@gnu.org>
 <87ftffli4y.fsf@gmail.com>
Reply-To: sebastian.miele@gmail.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47728)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <sebastian.miele@gmail.com>) id 1j2KDJ-0008Hi-7g
 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 14:31:54 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <sebastian.miele@gmail.com>) id 1j2KDI-0002DM-2U
 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 14:31:53 -0500
In-reply-to: <87ftffli4y.fsf@gmail.com>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
 <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
 <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
 <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
To: Bastien <bzg@gnu.org>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Sebastian Miele <sebastian.miele@gmail.com> writes:

> Bastien <bzg@gnu.org> writes:
> >
> > Sebastian Miele <sebastian.miele@gmail.com> writes:
> >
> > > I am quite certain, that the content indentation conceptually and
> > > technically belongs to the buffer containing the src block.
> >
> > Sorry, I think I got confused - let's call buffer-A the one with the
> > "#+begin_src ... #+end_src" string and buffer-B the one you get when
> > C-c ' on this string (the src block).
> >
> > If "the buffer containing the src block" is buffer A, then we are on
> > the same line.  Is it the case?  Or am I still confused?
>
> Yes, we are on the same line.

Part of me feels that I should find a better explanation and spare you
the trouble of figuring out what I mean. But there seems to be no
(significantly) better explanation I can come up with without going to
greater lengths and especially investing considerable time for working
out very clear terminology for the situation.

I currently feel a tension between not wanting you to have to spend
considerable time understanding what I wrote and not wanting myself to
spend time to try to explain it better.

However, if it is necessary, I will take the time.

Please try having it in the back of your mind for some days, maybe even
without actively spending much time on trying to understand it. Then
tell me if struck or not.

All the best
Sebastian