From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marcin Borkowski Subject: Re: Survey: changing a few default settings for Org 9.4 Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 21:15:53 +0100 Message-ID: <87v9o2s58m.fsf@mbork.pl> References: <87pnebf2ku.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47582) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j4Vli-0003rT-6u for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 15:16:27 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j4Vlf-0003tQ-Gn for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 15:16:24 -0500 In-reply-to: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Samuel Wales Cc: Bastien , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On 2020-02-19, at 21:02, Samuel Wales wrote: > just an idea but changing the subscript and superscript export feature > to =E2=80=98{}=E2=80=99 would reduce accidental invocation. i have seen = solecistic > subscripts on websites created with org (probably by experts who > babelize their .emacs!), and on this ml :). > > i have seen it used accidentally more than i have seen it used for its > intended purpose. {} seems more unambiguous. > > that would, of course, be an issue for those who already have a lot of > the short form in their technical and scientific papers. > > so there would have to be a nice regexp fixer. or a warning. +1!!! There is already an option for that (~org-use-sub-superscripts~). Changing the default to `{} seems a great idea. Best, --=20 Marcin Borkowski http://mbork.pl