From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id uDoMFZfJyl4wSgAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 24 May 2020 19:23:03 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id oFwfEZfJyl7zQQAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 24 May 2020 19:23:03 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D99ED9402D1 for ; Sun, 24 May 2020 19:23:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:49374 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jcwD7-0006zs-SK for larch@yhetil.org; Sun, 24 May 2020 15:23:01 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37044) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jcwCS-0006zh-Lj for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 24 May 2020 15:22:20 -0400 Received: from relay10.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.178.230]:37231) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jcwCQ-0006vL-3N; Sun, 24 May 2020 15:22:20 -0400 Received: from localhost (40-67.ipv4.commingeshautdebit.fr [185.131.40.67]) (Authenticated sender: admin@nicolasgoaziou.fr) by relay10.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 15345240002; Sun, 24 May 2020 19:22:12 +0000 (UTC) From: Nicolas Goaziou To: lamaglama@posteo.net Subject: Re: (org-cycle) in new plain list items References: <8cad8532ce7e4290b363d633dd2287d6@posteo.net> <87wo51vbmf.fsf@gnu.org> <08ba74d978cf7d4fe5df296731e582cc@posteo.net> Mail-Followup-To: lamaglama@posteo.net, Bastien , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Date: Sun, 24 May 2020 21:22:11 +0200 In-Reply-To: <08ba74d978cf7d4fe5df296731e582cc@posteo.net> (lamaglama@posteo.net's message of "Sun, 24 May 2020 15:51:43 +0200") Message-ID: <87v9klcf4s.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=217.70.178.230; envelope-from=mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr; helo=relay10.mail.gandi.net X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/05/24 15:22:13 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 3.11 and newer X-Spam_score_int: -25 X-Spam_score: -2.6 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Bastien , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.01 X-TUID: a153/5iEyc+U Hello, lamaglama@posteo.net writes: > Sorry, again. I am talking about "nested" plain lists: > >> - "Parent" level >> - Initial level for new item >> - > At this point I created the empty item with M-RET. If I then press TAB, > it demotes this item, which is also mentioned here: > https://orgmode.org/org.html#Plain-Lists [1]. > >> - "Parent" level >> - Initial level for new item >> - > So far, so good. But if I then press TAB again, we go back to this: > >> - "Parent" level >> - Initial level for new item >> - > Whereas I would expect it to move the item to this position: > >> - "Parent" level >> - Initial level for new item >> - > If it would do this, it would behave analogous to how it is implemented > for headings, as described at > https://orgmode.org/manual/Structure-Editing.html#Structure-Editing > [2]: I'm looking into it. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou