From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id 4rZjI3iF0l5PbQAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 30 May 2020 16:10:32 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id gFP+HniF0l7sOwAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 30 May 2020 16:10:32 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 229F99404DF for ; Sat, 30 May 2020 16:10:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:55704 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jf446-000141-Ns for larch@yhetil.org; Sat, 30 May 2020 12:10:30 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45494) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jf43i-00013W-Hx for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 30 May 2020 12:10:06 -0400 Received: from relay6-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.198]:51601) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jf43h-00027N-7y for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 30 May 2020 12:10:05 -0400 X-Originating-IP: 185.131.40.67 Received: from localhost (40-67.ipv4.commingeshautdebit.fr [185.131.40.67]) (Authenticated sender: admin@nicolasgoaziou.fr) by relay6-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E8EAFC0007; Sat, 30 May 2020 16:10:00 +0000 (UTC) From: Nicolas Goaziou To: Kevin Liu Subject: Re: nondeterministic org-test-with-temp-text? References: <874krxpmgu.fsf@nivekuil.com> Mail-Followup-To: Kevin Liu , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Date: Sat, 30 May 2020 18:09:58 +0200 In-Reply-To: <874krxpmgu.fsf@nivekuil.com> (Kevin Liu's message of "Sat, 30 May 2020 06:43:29 -0700") Message-ID: <87v9kdmmjt.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=217.70.183.198; envelope-from=mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr; helo=relay6-d.mail.gandi.net X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/05/30 12:10:01 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 3.11 and newer X-Spam_score_int: -25 X-Spam_score: -2.6 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -0.01 X-TUID: x90h0T8R8Da7 Hello, Kevin Liu writes: > I=E2=80=99m trying to add a test (which should fail at the moment, repres= enting > an org-mode bug), but it seems like each =E2=80=98should=E2=80=99 form is= actually > nondeterministic. The first form returns nil on the first eval and t on > subsequent evals, its behavior resetting upon any command, and the > second form does the inverse, returning t on the first eval and nil on > subsequent evals. > > Is this behavior expected? > > (ert-deftest test-org/org-next-visible-heading () > (should > (org-test-with-temp-text "* A\n** B\n\n\n* C" > (org-overview) > (org-cycle) > (org-cycle) > (org-next-visible-heading 1) > (and (bolp) (org-at-heading-p)))) You cannot call `org-cycle' consecutively without care, because it checks `last-command' and `this-command'. You need to fake their values before calling `org-cycle' again. Regards, --=20 Nicolas Goaziou