From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: depending TODOs, scheduling following TODOs automatically Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2007 04:37:46 +0100 Message-ID: <87tzp1lzzp.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <6dbd4d000710080626i52f0f0t9354addc33c0efee@mail.gmail.com> <20071008134353.GA10774@odin.demosthenes.org> <877ilxmimn.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <877ilxnh44.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <20071009020103.GD10774@odin.demosthenes.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1If4ys-0004z1-RE for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Oct 2007 22:37:58 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1If4yo-0004wu-El for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Oct 2007 22:37:57 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1If4yn-0004wV-Me for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Oct 2007 22:37:53 -0400 Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.170]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1If4yn-0008UD-1Q for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Oct 2007 22:37:53 -0400 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id m4so32507uge for ; Mon, 08 Oct 2007 19:37:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20071009020103.GD10774@odin.demosthenes.org> (Russell Adams's message of "Mon, 8 Oct 2007 21:01:03 -0500") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Russell Adams writes: > I love this discussion on properties for dependencies, but does anyone > have a suggestion on how to visualize it? Building a sparse tree with headlines that are affected by actions possibily triggered from the current task? > After you setup all these triggers, you still need a central place to > view the overview and steps involved (I'm thinking project management > specifically). Trying to figure this out will surely help designing the right implementation for task dependencies -- but maybe we've already speculated way too far and should refrain from getting the whole picture at once (I take responsability, if needed :) > Part of the original properties discussion revolved around project > management, dependencies, DURATION, and the ability to see a timeline > based on relative duration instead of schedule. Yes, I can remember that. Good old days. > Would an updated agenda view suffice? Would we need a way to link to > items and manually maintain order? Will our heros finally subdue the > evil Dr. Klan? Will the mysterious Gantt chart ever emerge? I guess most people in this list lost their jobs already anyway. -- Bastien