From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: Org-mode versus Taskpaper - now for real Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2008 18:59:03 +0200 Message-ID: <87tzii3meg.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <0277B507-1486-4172-B1C6-1B73B84148DD@science.uva.nl> <47F4A997.4000109@calicojack.co.uk> <47F4F442.7060104@calicojack.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JhSmM-0005ZU-OO for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Apr 2008 12:59:10 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JhSmL-0005YA-8q for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Apr 2008 12:59:10 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JhSmL-0005Y3-2m for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Apr 2008 12:59:09 -0400 Received: from hu-out-0506.google.com ([72.14.214.229]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JhSmK-0006Wj-MR for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Apr 2008 12:59:08 -0400 Received: by hu-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 23so1148923huc.1 for ; Thu, 03 Apr 2008 09:59:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <47F4F442.7060104@calicojack.co.uk> (Rick Moynihan's message of "Thu, 03 Apr 2008 16:14:10 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Rick Moynihan writes: > It's a shame Taskpaper doesn't just use a subset of org-mode's syntax > really. What would it be useful for? Using both TaskPaper and org-mode? I think people using TaskPaper are not likely to use org-mode and vice versa. I tend to agree some of the remarks about the website, but I think we should read/evaluate them without referring to much to other websites which have other purposes. -- Bastien