From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: Re: How to get \\ in title or author? Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2009 18:34:47 +0800 Message-ID: <87tyzco188.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <87ocpmc3mk.fsf@mundaneum.com> <87tyze4c7b.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87eiqhc1tt.fsf@mundaneum.com> <877hwadsb0.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87my55rw1b.fsf@mundaneum.com> <878wgou706.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <23362.1252472459@gamaville.dokosmarshall.org> <873a6wmoux.fsf@mundaneum.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MlKVu-000088-SM for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 06:34:58 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MlKVp-00006n-Qi for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 06:34:58 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=51698 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MlKVp-00006c-HK for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 06:34:53 -0400 Received: from mail-yx0-f179.google.com ([209.85.210.179]:33845) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MlKVo-0002n1-UE for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 06:34:53 -0400 Received: by yxe9 with SMTP id 9so5420750yxe.26 for ; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 03:34:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <873a6wmoux.fsf@mundaneum.com> (=?iso-8859-1?Q?=22S=E9bastien?= Vauban"'s message of "Wed, 09 Sep 2009 11:47:18 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?S=E9bastien?= Vauban Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Sébastien Vauban writes: > For sure, it'd be better if `\\' wasn't converted at all when exporting to > LaTeX (for the ones in the TITLE and AUTHOR meta-tags, at least). But how do you insert a backlash in the resulting div/ps/pdf then? My expectation was that converting \\ into \textbackslash was more common than inserting linebreaks in title (of which I didn't think in fact...) -- Bastien