From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bernt Hansen <bernt@norang.ca>
Subject: Re: Bug: Refile sometimes loses the last line [7.7
 (release_7.7.15.gc363)]
Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2011 19:07:20 -0400
Message-ID: <87ty9wbwt3.fsf@norang.ca>
References: <8762mh69yj.fsf@norang.ca> <8762meedru.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com>
	<87y5zarmab.fsf@norang.ca> <877h6ti839.wl%dmaus@ictsoc.de>
	<87r5519rdf.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <874o1xtc0w.wl%dmaus@ictsoc.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:58467)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bernt@norang.ca>) id 1Qp70f-0008Oj-Ij
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Aug 2011 19:07:26 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bernt@norang.ca>) id 1Qp70e-0006mg-J7
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Aug 2011 19:07:25 -0400
Received: from mho-04-ewr.mailhop.org ([204.13.248.74]:34086
	helo=mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bernt@norang.ca>) id 1Qp70e-0006mc-F2
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Aug 2011 19:07:24 -0400
In-Reply-To: <874o1xtc0w.wl%dmaus@ictsoc.de> (David Maus's message of "Thu, 04
	Aug 2011 17:46:39 +0200")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: </archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: David Maus <dmaus@ictsoc.de>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Jason Dunsmore <emacs-orgmode@deathroller.dunsmor.com>

David Maus <dmaus@ictsoc.de> writes:

> At Thu, 04 Aug 2011 09:35:24 -0500,
> Jason Dunsmore wrote:

>> I just tried out your patch.  The logic in your patch is slightly
>> different - it checks if the point is at the end of the last line in the
>> buffer, whereas mine checks if the point is anywhere on the last line.
>> I don't think it fixes the problem.  Bernt, can you test it?
>
> I does it for me and should do the trick. I tracked down the problem
> to `org-copy-subtree' not beeing able to correctly determine the end
> of the subtree to copy.

David's patch works fine for me.  Thanks both.

Regards,
Bernt