From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Eric Schulte <schulte.eric@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [org-babel] switching off (re-)evaluation of code blocks during
 Org export
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 07:02:29 -0700
Message-ID: <87ty5w5dzs.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <2A2CA71C-50E6-4533-BD40-2D879EF3BBCC@beds.ac.uk>
	<87aa7plzl8.fsf@gmail.com> <8062ictrp3.fsf@somewhere.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:37809)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <schulte.eric@gmail.com>) id 1RSt4k-0005VY-Aq
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 11:20:11 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <schulte.eric@gmail.com>) id 1RSt4i-0001Mj-MB
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 11:20:02 -0500
Received: from mail-gx0-f169.google.com ([209.85.161.169]:43147)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <schulte.eric@gmail.com>) id 1RSt4i-0001Md-J9
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 11:20:00 -0500
Received: by ggnq1 with SMTP id q1so482986ggn.0
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 08:20:00 -0800 (PST)
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Sebastien Vauban <wxhgmqzgwmuf@spammotel.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

>
> Hence, maybe we should be able to set 2 possible behaviors[1] for the
>`eval'
> parameter:
>
> - one for the interactive mode (yes/query/no), and
> - one for the export mode (yes/no, and maybe query as well?).
>

Agreed,

The eval header argument now supports the following four options
(updated in the manual under "Specific header arguments").

| no or never           | no evaluation anytime                 |
| query                 | query before evaluation anytime       |
| no-eval or never-eval | no evaluation during export           |
| query-eval            | query before evaluation during export |

Thanks for the suggestion

-- 
Eric Schulte
http://cs.unm.edu/~eschulte/