From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bastien <bzg@altern.org>
Subject: Re: unintended strike-through in table
Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2012 01:13:40 +0200
Message-ID: <87ty0egfob.fsf@altern.org>
References: <CABUh-740u3Aie6MP7+w2-qnymZVWaL2BuH-ZRZOwsQfs3f-0Nw@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:52929)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@googlemail.com>) id 1SLN0D-0001Bs-O9
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 19:12:34 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@googlemail.com>) id 1SLN0C-0000gZ-4s
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 19:12:33 -0400
Received: from mail-wg0-f49.google.com ([74.125.82.49]:43962)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@googlemail.com>) id 1SLN0B-0000gU-Ry
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 19:12:32 -0400
Received: by wgbdr1 with SMTP id dr1so7511273wgb.30
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 16:12:29 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CABUh-740u3Aie6MP7+w2-qnymZVWaL2BuH-ZRZOwsQfs3f-0Nw@mail.gmail.com>
	(Skip Collins's message of "Fri, 20 Apr 2012 14:27:41 -0400")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Skip Collins <skip.collins@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-org list <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

Hi Skip,

Skip Collins <skip.collins@gmail.com> writes:

> I see little reason to continue to support +strike-through+ text.
> Perhaps the simplest solution would be to deprecate stricken text and
> disable it by default, allowing for an option to turn it on for
> backward compatibility.

I agree.  If no one object, I will make this change soon.

Thanks,

-- 
 Bastien