From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Gour Subject: Re: bbdb or bbdb3 or org-contacts Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2013 16:50:42 +0100 Message-ID: <87txptv1kd.fsf@atmarama.noip.me> References: <87pq0qtsa1.fsf@urmel.duenenhof-wilhelm.de> <8738xi2aaf.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87txpyn9ql.fsf@casa.home> <871ucz3ofo.fsf@casa.home> <87r4kxo5nk.fsf@urmel.duenenhof-wilhelm.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:60506) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U21qQ-0003w6-Pw for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Feb 2013 10:51:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U21qP-0003k9-Lu for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Feb 2013 10:51:02 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:60554) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U21qP-0003k4-FY for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Feb 2013 10:51:01 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1U21qe-0006of-72 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Feb 2013 16:51:16 +0100 Received: from 93-142-243-129.adsl.net.t-com.hr ([93.142.243.129]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 03 Feb 2013 16:51:16 +0100 Received: from gour by 93-142-243-129.adsl.net.t-com.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 03 Feb 2013 16:51:16 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Dieter Wilhelm writes: > So in summary it is on the safe side to use bbdb for a transition > period Yes. > because neither the maintainability of bbdb3 nor org-contacts seem to be > ensured. Why do you think that maintainability of bbdb3 is not safe? To me looks that bbdb3 is in good swing at the moment. > PS: I hope future developments will bring forth a stable database > solution maintained within Emacs proper. That would be great, but maybe bbdb3 might fill it. Sincerely, Gour -- Even if you are considered to be the most sinful of all sinners, when you are situated in the boat of transcendental knowledge you will be able to cross over the ocean of miseries.