From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dmitry Gutov Subject: Re: org-export raises stringp nil error Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2013 13:25:16 +0400 Message-ID: <87txomz1j7.fsf@yandex.ru> References: <87ip539io1.fsf@nautilus.nautilus> <87zjye96ph.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87vc928kcm.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <83sj46z468.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: In-Reply-To: (joakim@verona.se's message of "Fri, 08 Mar 2013 10:15:07 +0100") List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: joakim@verona.se Cc: lele@metapensiero.it, emacs-devel@gnu.org, bzg@gnu.org, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Eli Zaretskii , Leo Liu List-Id: emacs-orgmode.gnu.org joakim@verona.se writes: > Just a small reminder of the idea Stefan sometimes drops in these > discussions: > - Emacs "trunk" could be stripped of all but the bare essentials to > achieve bootstrap. I like the idea of stripping big bundled packages (like org, gnus, cedet, maybe even tramp, if that's possible). > - distribution tarballs could be made from trunk+elpa. > > Since I dont do releases for Emacs I dont get to have an opinion on the > matter, but if pressed, I would say this idea has considerable merit. If distribution tarballs include code from elpa, then I imagine code freeze rules would also apply to elpa branch. So I don't see how this would be an improvement.