From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christopher Schmidt Subject: Re: ox-html.el removal Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2013 19:30:44 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <87txojdpck@ch.ristopher.com> References: <87y5dvl1pg.fsf@gmail.com> <20130310195541.3430f802@vknecht-intel.unibw-hamburg.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:41618) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UElxL-0004Xo-4H for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Mar 2013 15:30:54 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UElxI-0001ud-1A for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Mar 2013 15:30:51 -0400 Received: from ristopher.com ([146.185.21.93]:32897 helo=saturn.ch.ristopher.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UElxH-0001uW-PB for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Mar 2013 15:30:47 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20130310195541.3430f802@vknecht-intel.unibw-hamburg.de> (Detlef Steuer's message of "Sun, 10 Mar 2013 19:55:41 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Cc: Jambunathan K Detlef Steuer writes: > But: The papers the FSF asked you to sign were constructed for exactly > this case I assume. That's not right. https://www.gnu.org/licenses/why-assign.html I am not a copyright lawyer. So is everyone else subscribed to this list. The FSF's copyright clerk should assist on this issue. #+BEGIN my2cents If Jambunathan does not want code he wrote to be part of Org any more, I'd respect his wish. At first sight this is a loss for Org. This does not need to be the end, though. GSoC is coming up, rewriting specific exporter look like great projects. Jambunathan did not mention what is going to happen to his code. Jambu, are you going to maintain the code you wrote separately. If so, is code free, libre and upwards compatible to future Org releases? #+END A long yet somewhat relevant read: https://lwn.net/Articles/529522/ http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.encryption.gpg.gnutls.devel/6465 Christopher