From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: Encoding Problem in export? Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 09:34:53 +0200 Message-ID: <87txjk5s2q.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87bo5s27ey.fsf@sachwertpartner.de> <877ggg7suh.fsf@gmail.com> <51EF32F4.9030309@gmx.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57300) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V1tas-0003p3-3g for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 03:34:43 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V1tar-0008H4-3d for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 03:34:42 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-x230.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::230]:50822) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V1taq-0008Ft-UV for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 03:34:41 -0400 Received: by mail-wi0-f176.google.com with SMTP id ey16so3909974wid.9 for ; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 00:34:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <51EF32F4.9030309@gmx.de> (Robert Eckl's message of "Wed, 24 Jul 2013 03:50:44 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: eckl.r@gmx.de Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hello, Robert Eckl writes: > The issue seems to be introduced with > Org-mode version 8.0.6 (release_8.0.6-4-g21dd83 > org-element: Do not url-decode parsed links > The description sounds like the issue, no? IIUC, this is different from your issue. You write a URL that is not encoded, and, somehow, it gets encoded in the export output. This patch is about not decoding something already encoded. My guess is that your URL is encoded in the original buffer already. Try to use M-x visible-mode to see what is the real URL. If you see "http://example.de/?idprop%3D222", it probably means that `org-link-escape' is a bit too zealous (BTW why don't this function rely on `url-encode-url'?) Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou