From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rasmus Subject: Re: [patch][org-entities] More symbols Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2013 15:48:25 +0200 Message-ID: <87txi3e3me.fsf@gmx.us> References: <87y57zouv5.fsf@gmx.us> <87pptat5zf.fsf@gmail.com> <87vc2qqc3l.fsf@gmx.us> <874na4bsxn.fsf@gmail.com> <87wqmzfokv.fsf@gmx.us> <878uzfs7lk.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53213) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VGUUe-0002W6-8I for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Sep 2013 09:48:45 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VGUUW-0001xH-8w for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Sep 2013 09:48:36 -0400 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.18]:53274) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VGUUV-0001x0-V4 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Sep 2013 09:48:28 -0400 Received: from pank ([213.23.238.209]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MADqP-1VACx92Gzp-00BHj2 for ; Mon, 02 Sep 2013 15:48:26 +0200 In-Reply-To: <878uzfs7lk.fsf@gmail.com> (Jambunathan K.'s message of "Mon, 02 Sep 2013 18:17:43 +0530") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: kjambunathan@gmail.com Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Jambunathan K writes: > Rasmus writes: > >>> With some scripting, this pulling can be made less laborious but more >>> complete. >> >> Would you be able to get the HTML entities? Nicolas said that Org >> "prefers" entity names due to encoding. I can find the unicode number >> in Emacs, but not it's name. This is often the laborious part. > > Why use name when it is easier to use the numerical value?=20=20 Don't know. Here's a quote from earlier. I personally didn't look further into it. >> I wrote: >> 2. HTML symbols have been tested in Firefox. In a few cases I >> couldn't find a pretty name (like "π") in which case I've >> supplied the unicode number (like "&960;"). Is that OK? (E.g. can >> Org produce non-uft8 HTML?) > Nicolas wrote: > I think it can: see `org-html-coding-system'. It may be wiser to avoid > these symbols altogether. > Something like — should be good for =E2=80=94. (You can get the c= ode > value by doing the C-u C-x =3D on the displayed character.) Irrespective of encoding? > ,---- > | character: =E2=80=94 (displayed as =E2=80=94) (codepoint 8212, #o= 20024, #x2014) > | ^^^^^^ > | name: EM DASH > `---- > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > I see that the entity names are listed in > http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-entity-names/byalpha.html Right. Are we having (huge) gaps somewhere worth fixing? =E2=80=93Rasmus --=20 This space is left intentionally blank