From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric S Fraga Subject: Re: [BUG] Exporting to HTML a document with a #+CALL Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 16:39:56 +0100 Message-ID: <87txg6wucz.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> References: <20131022135839.GA874@smoon> <87fvrtqsal.fsf@gmail.com> <20131023135250.GC874@smoon> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37562) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VZO5h-0006Qg-Sj for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Oct 2013 12:49:05 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VZO5V-0008Dm-JJ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Oct 2013 12:48:57 -0400 Received: from tx2ehsobe001.messaging.microsoft.com ([65.55.88.11]:4172 helo=tx2outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VZO5V-0008Bf-DM for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Oct 2013 12:48:45 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20131023135250.GC874@smoon> (Vladimir Lomov's message of "Wed, 23 Oct 2013 22:52:50 +0900") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Vladimir Lomov Cc: General discussions about Org-mode , Eric Schulte Vladimir Lomov writes: > Hello, > ** Eric Schulte [2013-10-22 08:44:18 -0600]: > >> This issue only manifests with the Emacs compiled from source, and as >> such I can not reproduce it. > >> If this bug makes it into a released version of Emacs I can address it >> then. Until then perhaps this should be reported to the emacs-dev list. > > I found which revision introduced this behaviour (114069) but I don't > know how to prepare minimal example which would show incorrect behaviour > and wouldn't use Org syntax. Is that possible at all? I have been wondering the same thing for over a month now. This problem has been present in the snapshots of Emacs since early September. I haven't run into the problem in any non-org use of Emacs unfortunately. There's something about calls in babel that exercises the buffer management in Emacs more than other uses. > Nevertheless, I'll try to write a bug report based on Org example but > only tomorrow. > > P.S. I suppose there must be another problem commit because error > message was changed somewhere between commits 114100 and 114200, I don't > have time right now to dig deeper. Which is why I believe you thought you had a different problem than the one I reported back in September! I'm glad you've tracked this down as well. Keep us posted. Thanks, eric -- : Eric S Fraga (0xFFFCF67D), Emacs 24.3.50.1, Org release_8.2.1-87-g8e841c