From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Abrahamsen Subject: Re: [RFC] Simple cache mechanism for `org-element-at-point' Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 20:39:09 +0800 Message-ID: <87txfz53wy.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> References: <87wqlu834i.fsf@gmail.com> <87k3gzaye9.fsf@gmail.com> <87y55b9inw.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56194) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VbV2J-0003bS-6f for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 08:38:18 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VbV2B-0000vP-TS for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 08:38:11 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:53750) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VbV2B-0000vF-Me for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 08:38:03 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VbV2A-0005z2-4w for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 13:38:02 +0100 Received: from 114.248.26.151 ([114.248.26.151]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 13:38:02 +0100 Received: from eric by 114.248.26.151 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 13:38:02 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Nicolas Goaziou writes: > >> Here is a slight change to the second one, which will correctly reset >> cache when some variables are customized or when a buffer is refreshed >> (C-c C-c on a keyword). > > By the way, almost a month has passed since the first message in this > thread. Is someone still testing, or reviewing, it? I know it is > a non-trivial and quite sensitive change, so if one needs more time to > evaluate it, I certainly can wait more. > > Otherwise, it might be better to simply apply it on master and cope with > the bugs. I wasn't expecting to report back anything meaningful on this issue unless I saw a bug or problem. I've done quite a bit of day-to-day using these patches -- editing, agenda stuff, and exporting -- with no noticeable ill effects... so there's my report! E