From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thorsten Jolitz Subject: Re: [RFC] Syntax for macros Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 18:22:18 +0100 Message-ID: <87txclbd11.fsf@gmail.com> References: <86ha8n6ulq.fsf@somewhere.org> <87y51zta1a.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <867g9hiwzy.fsf@somewhere.org> <87sis592gg.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <8638k5iw3i.fsf@somewhere.org> <8738k57ebi.fsf@gmail.com> <86zjmdfrgl.fsf@somewhere.org> <87y51x8kyr.fsf@alphaville.bos.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50006) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W8vJM-0008Mt-4T for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 12:22:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W8vJG-0007ZC-02 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 12:21:56 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:45216) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W8vJF-0007Z5-PZ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 12:21:49 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1W8vJE-0002Kf-EG for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 18:21:48 +0100 Received: from g231232141.adsl.alicedsl.de ([92.231.232.141]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 18:21:48 +0100 Received: from tjolitz by g231232141.adsl.alicedsl.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 18:21:48 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Nick Dokos writes: > "Sebastien Vauban" > writes: > >>> There is also backwards compatibility to consider. Not only that, probability of false positives matters too. E.g. inserting text snippets in PicoLisp Wiki Syntax into an Org file could easily cause errors given the frequent use of {}: ,----------------------------------------------------------------------- | 1{Contrived Example} | | In /{picolisp-wiki-mode} braces are !{very} important, and in PicoLisp | itself Database objects are identified like this: | | :{{36}} | | denotes Object 36. | | Here is a list of objects in the DB: | | | *{ | -{{11}} | -{{36}} | -{{45}} | } `----------------------------------------------------------------------- This might be contrived, but is actually not that exotic. -- cheers, Thorsten