Re: [RFC] Block switches as #+HEADER: args?

[Thorsten Jolitz <tjolitz@gmail.com>]

Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes:

> Thorsten Jolitz <tjolitz@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Thats what I thought, but wouldn't it be nicer to treat switches and
>> header args more uniformly here?
>
> Header arguments are for Babel consumption. Switches are not. I see no
> reason to treat them similarly.
>
>> Otherwise custom solutions are needed to store the switches in some
>> place when nuking the surrounding #+begin/#+end lines in a conversion
>> process, and restore them again when converting back to Org. Or the
>> switches-info is simply lost during conversion.
>
> Since you already store header args, it isn't much difficult to also
> store switch, is it?

Ok, thanks, thats what I wanted to know (not necessarily what I wanted
to hear though), so I need a custom solution. 

-- 
cheers,
Thorsten