From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: [ox/ox-latex] Footnotes in titles Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2015 22:10:51 +0100 Message-ID: <87twymj2xw.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> References: <87sie8aqwh.fsf@gmx.us> <874mqnkvd5.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87wq3ij4n0.fsf@gmx.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56571) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YN6Ro-0002u0-GA for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Feb 2015 16:09:53 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YN6Rj-0001eM-Sn for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Feb 2015 16:09:48 -0500 Received: from relay6-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::198]:48005) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YN6Rj-0001eE-MT for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Feb 2015 16:09:43 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87wq3ij4n0.fsf@gmx.us> (rasmus@gmx.us's message of "Sun, 15 Feb 2015 21:34:11 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Rasmus Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Rasmus writes: > But footnotes in titles are set with symbols, e.g. * =E2=80=A0 =E2=80=A1 = and so forth. > IOW they are independent of the regular footnote counter, and don't > consume a number. But then it requires to implement a special handler in every export back-end and probably helper functions in ox.el. There are also DATE and AUTHOR to consider. > Footnotes in EXPORT_TITLE properties would be weird. I don't know if you > can have that. You tell me. This is not possible. But then, it is asymmetric if we allow footnotes in TITLE. For now, I pushed the "no footnote reference in keywords" branch, just to be on the safe side wrt CAPTION keywords. We can still discuss about making a special case for TITLE and al. Regards,