From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: Bug: org-habit treats all repeat tasks as ".+" type [7.9.3f (release_7.9.3f-17-g7524ef @ /usr/share/emacs/24.3/lisp/org/)] Date: Sat, 07 Mar 2015 20:34:26 +0100 Message-ID: <87twxw7gal.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> References: <87385i9yix.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43980) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YUKTS-00065q-EQ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Mar 2015 14:33:23 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YUKTP-0004U2-86 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Mar 2015 14:33:22 -0500 Received: from relay6-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::198]:55638) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YUKTP-0004Tf-28 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Mar 2015 14:33:19 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Leo He's message of "Sat, 7 Mar 2015 14:29:30 +0800") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Leo He Cc: kuangdash@163.com, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Leo He writes: > Thanks for your help, Nicolas and kungdash. > I've tried both 8.2.10 (installing via elpa) and the git repository > (8.3-beta and master branches), but still the same. I misunderstood the initial problem. This should be fixed in master. Thank you. > * TODO Test_++ > SCHEDULED: <2015-03-02 Mon ++1w> > - State "DONE" from "TODO" [2015-02-23 Mon 10:56] > - State "DONE" from "TODO" [2015-02-15 Sun 10:56] > - State "DONE" from "READY" [2015-02-02 Mon 10:56] > :PROPERTIES: > :STYLE: habit > :LAST_REPEAT: [2015-02-23 Mon 10:56] > :END: > > The Test_+ was marked as DONE one day after 02-09 (did not finish on time) > and Test_++ missed the 02-09 schedule. But the subsequent schedules are > DONE on time. This is not quite true. In the case above, second done stamp bumped scheduled to 2015-02-16 so last done came one week late. Regards,