From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Abrahamsen Subject: Re: couple questions about simple todo Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2015 09:50:44 +0800 Message-ID: <87tws4q7m3.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> References: <20150811154644.GA23197@bigblessing.localdomain> <87pp2ti6lq.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <20150812025933.GA6206@bigblessing.localdomain> <87h9o5glng.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <20150813005804.GA2914@bigblessing.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35817) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZPhfQ-0003xP-Hm for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Aug 2015 21:50:53 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZPhfN-0001vN-Ai for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Aug 2015 21:50:52 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:59859) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZPhfN-0001v9-4L for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Aug 2015 21:50:49 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZPhfK-0000Dl-Qi for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Aug 2015 03:50:47 +0200 Received: from 123.118.184.7 ([123.118.184.7]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 13 Aug 2015 03:50:46 +0200 Received: from eric by 123.118.184.7 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 13 Aug 2015 03:50:46 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org scrawler@gmail.com writes: > On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 12:45:23PM +0800, Eric Abrahamsen wrote: >> scrawler@gmail.com writes: >> >> > So I can avoid looking at all that? >> >> Sure, in principle you don't need that stuff at all! It depends on what >> you're using Org for, but if you're really trying to start simple and >> build up, then ignore properties etc for now. > > I meant I could have them, if needed, but wouldn't see them while > looking at the agenda. Oh, I see -- sure, the Agenda view does often end up looking cleaner. > I'm going to follow your advice except I'll probaby name TODO and DONE > something different, just to be different. Rebel! > Thanks very much for your help. :-) My pleasure.