From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Subject: Re: Bug: org-capture-refile doc inconsistency, refile bug [8.3.1
 (8.3.1-129-ga7c8d2-elpaplus @
 /home/jeeger/.emacs.d/elpa/org-plus-contrib-20150921/)]
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 22:54:38 +0200
Message-ID: <87twqjk06p.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
References: <87io71qrbt.wl-jan.seeger@thenybble.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42372)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1ZfDVk-0007mn-JA
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Sep 2015 16:53:01 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1ZfDVj-0004Vo-Ee
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Sep 2015 16:53:00 -0400
Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::195]:60564)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1ZfDVj-0004UK-7y
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Sep 2015 16:52:59 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87io71qrbt.wl-jan.seeger@thenybble.de> (Jan Seeger's message of
	"Wed, 23 Sep 2015 13:59:34 +0200")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Jan Seeger <jan.seeger@thenybble.de>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hello,

Jan Seeger <jan.seeger@thenybble.de> writes:

> I've fixed this bug for me by reversing the order of finalization and
> refiling, as stated in the documentation. I've attached a patch to do
> this, but I'm not entirely sure about the side effects caused by the
> patch. The test suite does pass though. If someone could weigh in on
> this, I'd be grateful!

Thank you for the patch. However, it contradicts
47b0eec8dc39990731f400640d64ab70a8356ccd.

See thread starting
<http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/78027> for an
explanation.


Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou