From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Subject: Re: [lint] imagemagick
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 16:50:12 +0100
Message-ID: <87twnhqdl7.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
References: <olulh8tjh2c.fsf@med.uni-goettingen.de>
	<878u4trvlt.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
	<olu8u4tjfji.fsf@med.uni-goettingen.de>
	<87zix9qfsz.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
	<olu4mfhjes3.fsf@med.uni-goettingen.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40836)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1a9an0-0002Hw-0F
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 10:48:22 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1a9amz-00078w-0C
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 10:48:21 -0500
Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::195]:47665)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1a9amy-00078j-LT
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 10:48:20 -0500
In-Reply-To: <olu4mfhjes3.fsf@med.uni-goettingen.de> (Andreas Leha's message
	of "Thu, 17 Dec 2015 15:06:20 +0000")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Andreas Leha <andreas.leha@med.uni-goettingen.de>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Andreas Leha <andreas.leha@med.uni-goettingen.de> writes:

> Exactly.  I guess my implicit question was, whether we should aim to
> make :imagemagick accept 'no' as nil to be consistent with the general
> org babel conventions.
>
> As I get it, you would say: no.

Not at all. My main concern was to fix the issue. This is another one.

We could accept "no" as nil. Patches welcome.

Meanwhile, we could also add a rule to `org-lint' warning about
deprecate use of "yes" and "no" and suggest to slowly switch to nil and
t, if that's really important.

-- 
Nicolas