From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nick Dokos Subject: Re: [RFC] Shrink columns dynamically Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2017 16:14:13 -0400 Message-ID: <87tw2kvylm.fsf@alphaville.usersys.redhat.com> References: <87bmoswkvs.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87d198uznu.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <87o9ss4aj4.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87inj0m5v5.fsf@mat.ucm.es> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55800) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dUf4d-00014f-Fo for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 16:14:28 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dUf4a-0007Wc-AV for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 16:14:27 -0400 Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=42949 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dUf4a-0007W8-3o for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 16:14:24 -0400 Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dUf4Q-0004qC-SC for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 22:14:14 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Uwe Brauer writes: >>>> "Nicolas" == Nicolas Goaziou writes: > > > Hello, > > Uwe Brauer writes: > > >> This is the patch I applied and tested? If so, I think it is a very good > >> thing and should be in master. > > > This is the same patch, along with the complete removal of old column > > narrowing using width cookies. > > Removing, oh oops > > > I just was faced with a table which just contained 3 columns but very > many rows. In second column however was very wide, it contained titled > of journals. So 'cutting' them to half was sufficient to identify them > but allowed me to see the third column. So I say narrowing and hiding > are two useful features. I would not say one can substitute the other. > Hiding is useful if I have very many small columns but narrowing for > very wide columns. > > > So please do not remove narrowing. > > Uwe Brauer > I would agree with that: I haven't tried the patch and column hiding, but I have used narrowing in the past, in exactly the context that Uwe describes. -- Nick