From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jarmo Hurri <jarmo.hurri@iki.fi>
Subject: Re: html export: pre.src support changed?
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2017 16:13:33 +0300
Message-ID: <87tw162v7m.fsf@iki.fi>
References: <87k223zije.fsf@iki.fi>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43375)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane.org>) id 1diKcY-00088K-9J
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Aug 2017 09:13:59 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane.org>) id 1diKcT-0001Ak-99
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Aug 2017 09:13:58 -0400
Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=47118 helo=blaine.gmane.org)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane.org>)
	id 1diKcT-0001A3-23
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Aug 2017 09:13:53 -0400
Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane.org>) id 1diKcA-0006Lm-5l
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Aug 2017 15:13:34 +0200
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
	<emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org


Greetings again.

Due to the flurry of responses to this thread (like, zero), I will make
a suggestion:

Could we reinstate pre.src by including the src class into pre tags as
well? That is, whereas we now have in the new export

<pre><code class="src...

we would have, sort of like in the old export

<pre class="src"><code class="src...

This would solve my issues. Would it be ok?

Jarmo