From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Marcin Borkowski <mbork@mbork.pl>
Subject: Re: Tasks performed on a certain day
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2018 12:45:48 +0100
Message-ID: <87tvktglg3.fsf@mbork.pl>
References: <87sh0efgs3.fsf@llwynog.ekleog.org> <xuu6pnviqf7g.fsf@gmail.com>
	<878t25g09o.fsf@llwynog.ekleog.org>
	<CAFdBzEpNg1o0XeKG_6FsmhspE4gcrvvudc0qx6n5Mi9=d-1VrA@mail.gmail.com>
	<87y3a5dsuw.fsf@llwynog.ekleog.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52172)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mbork@mbork.pl>) id 1gKMJA-0006g7-DD
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Nov 2018 06:47:42 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mbork@mbork.pl>) id 1gKMJ6-00088O-D6
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Nov 2018 06:47:40 -0500
Received: from mail.mojserwer.eu ([195.110.48.8]:34228)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mbork@mbork.pl>) id 1gKMJ6-00084O-0X
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Nov 2018 06:47:36 -0500
In-reply-to: <87y3a5dsuw.fsf@llwynog.ekleog.org>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
	<emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Leo Gaspard <orgmode@leo.gaspard.io>
Cc: Eric S Fraga <esflists@gmail.com>, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Ken Mankoff <mankoff@gmail.com>


On 2018-11-07, at 12:33, Leo Gaspard <orgmode@leo.gaspard.io> wrote:

> Ken Mankoff <mankoff@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> What about passive date stamps?
>>
>> TODO Thing
>> <Date>
>>
>> ?
>
> That's exactly what I was looking for! I hadn't seen an example with
> TODO coupled with <> dates, and didn't think it'd have a special
> behavior.
>
> Thank you and Marcin for this solution!

Glad to know that they work!

BTW, AFAIR they are called "plain" timestamps.

Best,

-- 
Marcin Borkowski
http://mbork.pl