Daniele Nicolodi writes: > Acceptance criterion for what? Adoption of what? > > It seems to me that some see a the adoption of a simplified > version of > the Org markup language outside Emacs and the org-mode > implementation as > something desirable. However, I don't see what the Org community > would > gain from that. > > [...] > > As explained many times now, you don't a formal specification > for this: > the specification is the org-mode implementation itself. > > However, I will not discourage anyone from working on some form > of > standardization, other than pointing out that IMO it is an > exercise with > very limited usefulness, impact and future. I think there are absolutely some benefits for Org users. I am personally interested in registering Org as an IANA MIME type. What will this do? Well, for starters I'd like to be able to attach org files without the type being recognised as "application/vnd.lotus-organizer" 🤢.