From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Eric Schulte" <schulte.eric@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Enhancing the Org/Gnus experience
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 10:59:19 -0600
Message-ID: <87sk07fl3s.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <80k4lj78ui.fsf@mundaneum.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=36542 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P6ncs-00020i-Fe
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Oct 2010 12:59:27 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <schulte.eric@gmail.com>) id 1P6ncr-0001Qs-B1
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Oct 2010 12:59:26 -0400
Received: from mail-yx0-f169.google.com ([209.85.213.169]:34282)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <schulte.eric@gmail.com>) id 1P6ncr-0001Qn-87
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Oct 2010 12:59:25 -0400
Received: by yxm34 with SMTP id 34so691779yxm.0
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Fri, 15 Oct 2010 09:59:24 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <80k4lj78ui.fsf@mundaneum.com> (=?utf-8?Q?=22S=C3=A9bastien?=
	Vauban"'s message of "Fri, 15 Oct 2010 17:51:17 +0200")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: =?utf-8?Q?S=C3=A9bastien?= Vauban <wxhgmqzgwmuf@spammotel.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

S=C3=A9bastien Vauban <wxhgmqzgwmuf@spammotel.com> writes:

[...]
>
> I don't have in mind full fontification like we now have in Org. No: *jus=
t the
> basic yellow background*, so that code blocks are outstanding in any mail,
> exactly *like it is now* but for the "cut here" markers (or "v+/v-").
>

While we're at it, why not go all the way to full fontification code
block fontification?  Is the current code in org-src portable enough to
be applied to this (or maybe be applied whenever org-struct mode is
enabled)?

>
> Though, I don't know where to begin... Can some Org/Gnus expert give a
> hint?
>

This strays out of my narrow areas of expertise, but I hereby throw my
+1 onto the request.

>
> Best regards,
>   Seb