From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Matt Lundin <mdl@imapmail.org>
Subject: Re: Bug: Scatter doubles up on SCHEDULED items [7.4]
Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2011 09:29:03 -0500
Message-ID: <87sjwbaimo.fsf@fastmail.fm>
References: <87mxn7jrq2.wl%csx239@coventry.ac.uk>
	<87wrlvhhf4.wl%dmaus@ictsoc.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=47076 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PjBnW-0006pL-Br
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Jan 2011 09:29:07 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <lundin@fastmail.fm>) id 1PjBnV-0000O5-1R
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Jan 2011 09:29:06 -0500
Received: from out1.smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:45462)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <lundin@fastmail.fm>) id 1PjBnU-0000O1-RX
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Jan 2011 09:29:04 -0500
In-Reply-To: <87wrlvhhf4.wl%dmaus@ictsoc.de> (David Maus's message of "Sun, 23
	Jan 2011 14:35:11 +0100")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: David Maus <dmaus@ictsoc.de>
Cc: James Shuttleworth <csx239@coventry.ac.uk>, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

David Maus <dmaus@ictsoc.de> writes:

> At Tue, 11 Jan 2011 17:05:41 +0000,
> James Shuttleworth wrote:

>> Hi,
>>   I love the idea of the new bulk scatter command, but it's giving me
>>   a problem.  When used, it adds an extra SCHEDULED item to entries
>>   rather than change the current one.  Maybe this is expected
>>   behaviour and I just don't "get it", but I don't think so.
>>
>>   If I can give any more information that might be useful, I'm happy
>>   to.

I cannot reproduce this.

James, can you please provide a sample entry on which this behavior occurs.

Also, on that same entry, could you please test whether a normal
rescheduling command, C-c C-s, results in the same behavior.

> What do I have to do to reproduce the problem?  I don't understand
> what "bulk scatter command" actually refers to.

It's a new feature introduced by John Wiegley. To use it, mark one or
more entries in the agenda and type "B S".

Best,
Matt