From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas <n.goaziou@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: lists and fill-region
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 01:03:20 +0100
Message-ID: <87sjuv265z.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTi=BDhy7g1BQv=WdVDTw7H581GmD6EYdfSq=04Zr@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=43103 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PxTLg-0008N8-TQ
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 19:03:25 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1PxTLg-000418-5j
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 19:03:25 -0500
Received: from mail-ww0-f49.google.com ([74.125.82.49]:44798)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1PxTLg-000414-0H
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 19:03:24 -0500
Received: by wwc33 with SMTP id 33so1109110wwc.30
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 16:03:22 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=BDhy7g1BQv=WdVDTw7H581GmD6EYdfSq=04Zr@mail.gmail.com>
	(michael hohn's message of "Wed, 9 Mar 2011 11:04:13 -0800")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: michael hohn <mhhohn@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hello,

michael hohn <mhhohn@gmail.com> writes:

> after upgrading to the current git head (from a version around 6.36),
> fill-region produces wrong indentation for my lists.  Starting with
>
> - one
>   - very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, long
>   - short
>
> and marking the second item via mark-paragraph followed by fill-region
> results in
>
> - one
>   - very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very,
> very, long
>   - short
>

I have pushed a fix for this case. Thanks for your report, it reminds me
filling in lists is still a bit fragile, and needs some care.

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas