From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: bug: org-sort-list, `f'
Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 17:51:00 +0200
Message-ID: <87sjs15ul7.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <BANLkTinyXxwDtGq4YyY0K+oV=dcJMeFKOA@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:55232)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1QPcpw-0003wI-RI
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 26 May 2011 11:51:01 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1QPcpw-0002zW-4t
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 26 May 2011 11:51:00 -0400
Received: from mail-ww0-f49.google.com ([74.125.82.49]:62323)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1QPcpw-0002zL-0E
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 26 May 2011 11:51:00 -0400
Received: by wwb39 with SMTP id 39so775902wwb.30
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Thu, 26 May 2011 08:50:58 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTinyXxwDtGq4YyY0K+oV=dcJMeFKOA@mail.gmail.com> (Le Wang's
	message of "Thu, 26 May 2011 13:38:06 +0800")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: </archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Le Wang <l26wang@gmail.com>
Cc: Orgmode Mailing List <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

Hello,

Le Wang <l26wang@gmail.com> writes:

> patch fixes sorting lists with custom getkey-func.  Bug was trying to
> evaluate getkey-func while setting it, so it was always nil.

Indeed !

I've applied a slightly modified version of your patch. Thank you for
reporting this and providing the patch.

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou