From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bastien <bzg@altern.org>
Subject: Re: Syntax for tags-todo in org-agenda-custom-commands
Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2011 10:17:29 +0200
Message-ID: <87sjqh5gpy.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <87zkkq5lpv.fsf@slate.zedat.fu-berlin.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:41555)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@googlemail.com>) id 1Qf6O4-0001Ux-73
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Jul 2011 04:26:13 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@googlemail.com>) id 1Qf6O2-0004qp-Dd
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Jul 2011 04:26:12 -0400
Received: from mail-fx0-f52.google.com ([209.85.161.52]:49318)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@googlemail.com>) id 1Qf6O1-0004qd-Qh
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Jul 2011 04:26:10 -0400
Received: by fxd18 with SMTP id 18so1702563fxd.39
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Fri, 08 Jul 2011 01:26:09 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <87zkkq5lpv.fsf@slate.zedat.fu-berlin.de> (Loris Bennett's
	message of "Thu, 07 Jul 2011 14:17:16 +0200")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: </archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Loris Bennett <loris.bennett@fu-berlin.de>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hi Loris,

"Loris Bennett" <loris.bennett@fu-berlin.de> writes:

> In my org-agenda-custom-commands I've got two block entries:
>
> tags-todo "office&(project|task)"
>
> and 
>
> tags-todo "home&(project|task)"
>
> Items with :office:project: and :home:project: are separated properly,
> but :office:task: and :home:task: end up in both lists.

Can you send a test file, with actual results and expected results?  

I _guess_ the problem you have, but I'd like to see/test it.

> What should the correct syntax be and where is it described?

Did you look in the manual?  What is missing?

Thanks!

-- 
 Bastien