From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Eric S Fraga <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Standardized code block keywords
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 08:37:13 +0100
Message-ID: <87sjmiq1qu.fsf@ucl.ac.uk>
References: <87pqhrih3s.fsf@gmail.com> <87aa8u5mu7.fsf@gmail.com>
	<871uu65j7i.fsf@gmail.com> <201110231442.17386.DanielBausch@gmx.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:56966)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk>) id 1RIH94-0007Of-U2
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 05:48:40 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk>) id 1RIH93-0003S6-2j
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 05:48:38 -0400
Received: from vscani-d2.ucl.ac.uk ([144.82.108.133]:43556)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk>) id 1RIH92-0003Rs-Ui
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 05:48:37 -0400
In-Reply-To: <201110231442.17386.DanielBausch@gmx.de> (Daniel Bausch's message
	of "Sun, 23 Oct 2011 14:42:17 +0200")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Daniel Bausch <DanielBausch@gmx.de>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Daniel Bausch <DanielBausch@gmx.de> writes:

> Hi,
>
>>          named code blocks [1] -- "source" "srcname" "function"
>> calling external functions [2] -- "call" "lob"
>>                 named data [3] -- "tblname" "resname" "results" "data"
>
> what about "#+name:" for [1] and [3], and "#+call:" for [2] ?
>
> That a table or list contains data is obvious.  The only thing, the additional 
> line is for, is to "name" it.  That a source block contains source is also 
> obvious and is already noted by the use of #+begin_src, so why duplicate the 
> "src"-part?
>
> Daniel

I don't know if I've left it too late to vote on this but...

I would go for "name" for [1] and [3] and "call" for [2].

I can, however, see the need for distinguishing between data tables and
results so could be convinced that "data" and "results" should be used
for [3].  In any case, I do know that I dislike srcname and tblname...

-- 
: Eric S Fraga (GnuPG: 0xC89193D8FFFCF67D) in Emacs 24.0.90.1
: using Org-mode version 7.7 (release_7.7.452.g767f5)