From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Publishing using the new exporter
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 18:59:08 +0200
Message-ID: <87sj9m461v.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <50602E92.3080705@mpip-mainz.mpg.de> <87y5jzafab.fsf@gmail.com>
	<50609817.705@mpip-mainz.mpg.de> <87a9vz7stn.fsf@gmail.com>
	<507045B7.9010101@mpip-mainz.mpg.de> <877gr3cwzi.fsf@gmail.com>
	<507181CD.1050005@mpip-mainz.mpg.de> <87391prumz.fsf@gmail.com>
	<5072F9BD.7020505@mpip-mainz.mpg.de> <87y5jgrjrt.fsf@gmail.com>
	<50730F2B.5030902@mpip-mainz.mpg.de>
	<5073F753.4010209@mpip-mainz.mpg.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:51822)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1TLzgl-0000xd-E3
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Oct 2012 13:03:23 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1TLzgh-0004r0-5q
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Oct 2012 13:03:19 -0400
Received: from mail-we0-f169.google.com ([74.125.82.169]:55000)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1TLzgg-0004qg-Vl
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Oct 2012 13:03:15 -0400
Received: by mail-we0-f169.google.com with SMTP id u3so534348wey.0
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Wed, 10 Oct 2012 10:03:14 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <5073F753.4010209@mpip-mainz.mpg.de> (Robert Klein's message of
	"Tue, 09 Oct 2012 12:07:15 +0200")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Robert Klein <kleinrob@mpip-mainz.mpg.de>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Eric Schulte <eric.schulte@gmx.com>

Hello,

Robert Klein <kleinrob@mpip-mainz.mpg.de> writes:

> I got i working with this patch:
>
> diff --git a/contrib/lisp/org-e-latex.el b/contrib/lisp/org-e-latex.el
> index 80b8ddb..2d4ad35 100644
> --- a/contrib/lisp/org-e-latex.el
> +++ b/contrib/lisp/org-e-latex.el
> @@ -2670,6 +2670,7 @@ Return PDF file name or an error if it couldn't
> be produced."
>    (let* ((wconfig (current-window-configuration))
>          (texfile (file-truename texfile))
>          (base (file-name-sans-extension texfile))
> +        (default-directory base)
>          errors)
>      (message (format "Processing LaTeX file %s ..." texfile))
>      (unwind-protect
>
>
> After reading a bit in the emacs lisp reference manual I knew the
> issue is something with default-directory.  Then I examined the code
> of the old exporter and looked for a "similar" place in the new
> exporter, happily finding a 'let*( ...'.   Not sure, this is Ok or
> even the right place.  Just happy at the moment it does work.
>
> Both cases (buffer visited in base-directory and not in
> base-directory) work with the change.

I still cannot reproduce the problem, even with your recipe. Could you
double-check it?

Also, there's nothing in `org-e-latex-compile' that should depend on
default-directory anyway.


Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou