From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ivan Vilata i Balaguer Subject: Re: [PATCH] Time specifications: Allow specifying relative times Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 23:53:14 +0100 Message-ID: <87sj8b3ig5.fsf@edgar.terramar.selidor.net> References: <87y5pqzmev.fsf@altern.org> <87k3twoulm.fsf@edgar.terramar.selidor.net> <87vcd9duv3.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87wqxp2gk6.fsf@edgar.terramar.selidor.net> <87ip98ynns.fsf@Rainer.invalid> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:45537) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TYlpt-0003oS-UA for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 17:53:36 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TYlpq-0002oK-Rc for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 17:53:33 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:52141) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TYlpq-0002o4-Kk for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 17:53:30 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TYlpw-0005J5-Hr for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 23:53:36 +0100 Received: from 206.21.15.37.dynamic.jazztel.es ([37.15.21.206]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 23:53:36 +0100 Received: from ivan by 206.21.15.37.dynamic.jazztel.es with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 23:53:36 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Achim Gratz (2012-11-14 20:44:55 +0100) wrote: > Ivan Vilata i Balaguer writes: >> Bastien (2012-11-13 23:02:40 +0100) wrote: >>> I'm not sure what went wrong on your side but the patch >>> has been applied here: >>> >>> http://orgmode.org/cgit.cgi/org-mode.git/commit/?id=001bcb9645bf0a5ea72f09ae502a8410319473c0 >> >> I apologise if I'm getting confused with git or the way the Org repo >> is structured, but maybe the change was accidentally reverted later. > > It was reverted with 6f78edd68c, two hours after having been applied. So the relative time specifications patch caused some kind of problem? That'd be a real shame, the feature could be very useful. :( Thanks for the info, -- Ivan Vilata i Balaguer -- https://elvil.net/