From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: "Generic" Source block language specification?
Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2012 01:28:37 +0100
Message-ID: <87sj7y4jbe.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <50ACE060.4030207@gmail.com> <87vccw8a11.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:40407)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1TcQ9U-0006Nq-BX
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Nov 2012 19:32:53 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1TcQ9T-0002bA-H2
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Nov 2012 19:32:52 -0500
Received: from mail-wg0-f49.google.com ([74.125.82.49]:61159)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1TcQ9T-0002b4-9v
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Nov 2012 19:32:51 -0500
Received: by mail-wg0-f49.google.com with SMTP id gg4so1187083wgb.30
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Sat, 24 Nov 2012 16:32:50 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <87vccw8a11.fsf@gmail.com> (Jambunathan K.'s message of "Fri, 23
	Nov 2012 23:41:06 +0530")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Jambunathan K <kjambunathan@gmail.com>
Cc: Rainer@krugs.de, emacs-orgmode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

Hello,

Jambunathan K <kjambunathan@gmail.com> writes:

> Rainer M Krug <r.m.krug@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> I have in a document a definition of a projection, which is essentially a text as follow:
>>
>> #+BEGIN_src
>>   +proj=aea +lat_1=-28.25
>>           +lat_2=-29.75
>>           +lat_0=29
>>           +lon_0=30.75
>>           +x_0=0
>>           +y_0=0
>>           +datum=WGS84
>>           +units=m
>>           +no_defs
>> #+END_src
>>
>> Now this does obviously not export, as the source block language is missing. Is there a way that I
>> can get the same formating of the source in the exportes output but without the syntax highlighting?
>>
>> BEGIN_EXAMPLE
>> END_EXAMPLE
>>
>> is similar, but I would like the block to be formated as the SRC
>> blocks.
>
> Marking the src block as `fundamental' has a drawback.  One can no
> longer have in-buffer fontification of src blocks.
>
> A better option would be to have a custom variable which produces
> black-and-white src blocks on export.  
>
> ODT already has this option.
>
>     C-h v org-e-odt-fontify-srcblocks RET
>
> I am CCing Nicolas, to check whether he would be interested in
> introducing an export knob for this.

I still don't get what is wrong with example blocks (wrt export). Would
someone care to elaborate?


Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou