From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: export_file_name problem with new exporter Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 17:16:50 +0100 Message-ID: <87sj7agc5p.fsf@gmail.com> References: <8738zadrpn.fsf@gmail.com> <87y5h2cbao.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:57847) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TjBX2-0001jV-JM for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 11:21:10 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TjBWv-0000j4-H8 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 11:21:08 -0500 Received: from mail-wg0-f41.google.com ([74.125.82.41]:62829) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TjBWv-0000iz-Aw for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 11:21:01 -0500 Received: by mail-wg0-f41.google.com with SMTP id ds1so2405189wgb.0 for ; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 08:21:00 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: (Alan Schmitt's message of "Thu, 13 Dec 2012 15:03:32 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Alan Schmitt Cc: emacs-orgmode Alan Schmitt writes: > In other words, I see three places of interest: > - where the org file is > - where export and compilation occurs > - where the final result is put > > Publishing lets us deal with the last one, but I don't think there is a > way to distinguish between the first two. No, there isn't. OTOH, step 2 only makes sense for back-ends that require to compile output. Maybe a local solution can be provided for them. For example, tweaking `org-e-latex-pdf-process' probably allows to move compilation elsewhere. > By "validating", do you mean that I have received them back signed from > the FSF? (I signed and sent them a few weeks ago, still waiting to get > them back ...) Yes. We have to wait for confirmation from the FSF. It shouldn't be too long now. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou