From: Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com>
To: Nicolas Girard <girard.nicolas@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [Babel] org-babel-execute-buffer gives different results than org-babel-exp-non-block-elements
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 01:06:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87siy1jpff.fsf@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANMKmeeQ_y3hFm8MVW2u287FiKGQm8rkFSaYDifZLt8TGVtreg@mail.gmail.com> (Nicolas Girard's message of "Thu, 22 Aug 2013 23:01:45 +0200")
Nicolas Girard <girard.nicolas@gmail.com> writes:
> I'm ashamed... but this time I swear I started a minimal emacs session
> and got it to work. The instructions have slightly changed and are
> written at the very beginning of the attached minimal document.
I see.
There is an important difference between evaluating a buffer and
evaluating a buffer during export. In the latter, Babel has to deal with
replacement values, i.e., code block is replaced by its results. See the
difference between `org-export-execute-babel-code' and
`org-babel-execute-buffer' in a buffer containing only
src_emacs-lisp[:results raw]{(+ 1 2)}
In this case, your code removes the code (and much more) as
a side-effect. This confuses `org-babel-exp-non-block-elements', which
also tries to remove it. As this fails, it removes a random part of the
buffer instead (probably as a mean revenge).
`org-babel-exp-non-block-elements' and `org-babel-exp-process-buffer'
could probably check if code still exists before trying to remove (and
replace) it.
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-22 23:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-22 18:23 [Babel] org-babel-execute-buffer gives different results than org-babel-exp-non-block-elements Nicolas Girard
2013-08-22 18:41 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2013-08-22 19:28 ` Nicolas Girard
2013-08-22 20:28 ` Nicolas Girard
2013-08-22 20:33 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2013-08-22 21:01 ` Nicolas Girard
2013-08-22 23:06 ` Nicolas Goaziou [this message]
2013-08-22 23:20 ` Nicolas Girard
2013-08-23 8:11 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2013-08-23 14:55 ` Eric Schulte
2013-08-26 10:33 ` Nicolas Goaziou
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.orgmode.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87siy1jpff.fsf@gmail.com \
--to=n.goaziou@gmail.com \
--cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
--cc=girard.nicolas@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).