From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Achim Gratz Subject: Re: #+INCLUDE: myfile.html html does not include /literally/; Org processes Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2014 23:50:46 +0200 Message-ID: <87sinkibt5.fsf@Rainer.invalid> References: <538AA6B8.40604@gmail.com> <8761kl12w9.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87bnudf2u4.fsf@gmail.com> <87wqd1yo84.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <8738fpeyov.fsf@gmail.com> <87sinpylly.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87r438eujq.fsf@gmail.com> <87iookzsto.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87fvjoenlt.fsf@gmail.com> <87egz8zowa.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87egz5pw4g.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55327) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WsJ5V-0008Vj-4F for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Jun 2014 17:51:19 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WsJ5N-0005FI-Ak for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Jun 2014 17:51:13 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:43757) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WsJ5M-0005F4-T9 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Jun 2014 17:51:05 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WsJ5I-00071n-VP for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Jun 2014 23:51:00 +0200 Received: from pd9eb0a82.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([217.235.10.130]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 04 Jun 2014 23:51:00 +0200 Received: from Stromeko by pd9eb0a82.dip0.t-ipconnect.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 04 Jun 2014 23:51:00 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Nicolas Goaziou writes: > On second thought, we shouldn't bother too much about it, let the user > provide any keyword, and turn it into a block of the same name. > > So, for example, both > > #+include: "file.html" html > > and > > #+include: "file.html" center > > are valid, even though the second one makes little sense. > > It is close to your initial approach, minus the "wrap" keyword, which > seems unnecessary. If you agree with this suggestion, do you volunteer > to finalize it, along with the required documentation? I'll have a look at that later this week. Regards, Achim. -- +<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+ Samples for the Waldorf Blofeld: http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#BlofeldSamplesExtra