From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rasmus Subject: Re: [POLL] Syntax change: make \[...\] non-inline Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 16:56:39 +0200 Message-ID: <87sill7crc.fsf@gmx.us> References: <87lhrd1xo7.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50579) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XBmMG-0004HO-8a for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Jul 2014 10:57:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XBmMA-0006lg-6O for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Jul 2014 10:57:00 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:57231) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XBmM9-0006lQ-VQ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Jul 2014 10:56:54 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XBmM8-0005QR-GY for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Jul 2014 16:56:52 +0200 Received: from 109.201.154.186 ([109.201.154.186]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2014 16:56:52 +0200 Received: from rasmus by 109.201.154.186 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2014 16:56:52 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Nicolas Goaziou writes: > The current proposal is to make them elements instead of objects in Org > syntax (i.e, a `latex-environment' instead of a `latex-fragment'). > [...] > WDYT? I think it's a bad idea. One can use \begin{EQUATION} · \end{EQUATION} (where EQUATION is one's favorite math-construct) for that purpose. With cdlatex, structure templates (org-structure-template-alist) or key-chord.el it need not require much effort to insert such an environment. Thus, the pros seem trivial in my opinion. OTOH, it's nice to have a inline display-math constructor, \[·\], and the up-front cost of comparability-issues seems expensive. Cheers, Rasmus -- The right to be left alone is a human right