From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bastien <bzg@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Regex Speedup for org-refresh-category-properties.
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 23:28:51 +0200
Message-ID: <87siljyhv0.fsf@bzg.ath.cx>
References: <m261igx25h.fsf@purvis.id.au> <87vbqgf86j.fsf@Rainer.invalid>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35561)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bounce+0e656e.a52ba-emacs-orgmode=gnu.org@bzg.fr>)
	id 1XCExB-00029P-54
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Jul 2014 17:29:06 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bounce+0e656e.a52ba-emacs-orgmode=gnu.org@bzg.fr>)
	id 1XCEx5-0000op-RF
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Jul 2014 17:29:01 -0400
Received: from mail-s76.mailgun.info ([184.173.153.204]:47694)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bounce+0e656e.a52ba-emacs-orgmode=gnu.org@bzg.fr>)
	id 1XCEx5-0000ol-O4
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Jul 2014 17:28:55 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87vbqgf86j.fsf@Rainer.invalid> (Achim Gratz's message of
	"Tue,	29 Jul 2014 18:20:36 +0200")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Achim Gratz <Stromeko@nexgo.de>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Achim Gratz <Stromeko@nexgo.de> writes:

> I think that "^[ \t]*\\(\\(?:#\\+\\|:\\)CATEGORY:\\)\\(.*\\)" would be a
> better regex, assuming that the original regex was doing the right thing.

Applied, thanks,

-- 
 Bastien