From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Oleh Krehel Subject: Re: How to make a non-GPL Org-mode exporter? Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 09:55:09 +0200 Message-ID: <87si881ztu.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87pp3dvm18.fsf@mbork.pl> <55B62668.7020100@grinta.net> <87h9opv8nr.fsf@mbork.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60043) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZJzqI-0007Dn-KX for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jul 2015 04:02:31 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZJzqE-00076g-Km for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jul 2015 04:02:30 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-x22c.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::22c]:35647) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZJzqE-00076S-Dd for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jul 2015 04:02:26 -0400 Received: by wibxm9 with SMTP id xm9so144874706wib.0 for ; Tue, 28 Jul 2015 01:02:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87h9opv8nr.fsf@mbork.pl> (Marcin Borkowski's message of "Mon, 27 Jul 2015 18:59:20 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Marcin Borkowski Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Marcin Borkowski writes: >> As Oleh Krehel pointed out in a reply to another mail of yours, if your >> code links to org-mode code (or other GPL code) you cannot release it >> under a different license. I'm not sure about how linking is intended in >> Elisp sense of ('require)ing a library, but I believe it is analog to >> executable linking in machine code programs. > > I understand, and I thank you for your clarification. (Though I still > consider it plain ridiculous. And the fact that Oleh's own blog is > CC-BY-NC-SA licensed, and contains many fragments of Elisp code, both > small snippets and whole functions, thus rendering it illegal, is > sweet;-).) I think posting snippets on a blog falls into "Fair Use". As long as I'm not posting something which is a full program, this is fine. Besides, CC-BY-NC-SA is compatible with GPL! Compatible. With GPL. Quoting the SA (ShareAlike) part from the website: > ShareAlike =E2=80=94 If you remix, transform, or build upon the material,= you > must distribute your contributions under the same license as the > original. So if anyone dislikes GPL, add CC-...-SA to your list as well. --Oleh