From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeroen Tiebout Subject: Re: README for bitbucket - export to which format? Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2015 14:17:51 +0100 Message-ID: <87si3iuzcw.fsf@tinktenk.be> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44527) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a4qFJ-00021F-Ga for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Dec 2015 08:17:58 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a4qFG-00043S-7Y for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Dec 2015 08:17:57 -0500 Received: from mail-wm0-x22a.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::22a]:35329) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a4qFG-00042r-1V for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Dec 2015 08:17:54 -0500 Received: by wmuu63 with SMTP id u63so61601315wmu.0 for ; Fri, 04 Dec 2015 05:17:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from zechs ([91.183.197.232]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ft4sm11998284wjb.37.2015.12.04.05.17.52 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 04 Dec 2015 05:17:52 -0800 (PST) In-reply-to: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org As far as I know markdown is the de facto standard for readme files on both GitHub and BitBucket. Org exporter does a fine job of translating your org file to .md Hope that helps. Jeroen On Friday 2015-12-04 13:38:47 CET, Rainer M Krug wrote: > Hi > > There are many formats available for READMEs on bitbucket, but > unfortunately not org mode (I am staying on bitbucket for private repos > and move them to github as soon as they can be made public - matter of > finances). > > So what is the best export format from org for bitbucket READMEs? At the > moment I am using text (UTF8) Which works, but I would like to have > syntax highlighting and clickable links? > > Thanks, > > Rainer